Clinton ally drops four-word TRUTH BOMB on recount effort…

Print Friendly

Back in October, then presidential smugly confident still-hopeful Hillary Clinton called then candidate Donald Trump’s suggestion he might not accept the election results without question “horrifying.”

After she and her media fully excoriated Trump for even the mere suggestion, Hillary Clinton must be horrified to find herself doing exactly what she called “horrifying” in her rival. A full three weeks after the election was called — and Hillary herself conceded — here we are talking about trying to get recounts underway in not just one, but three, states. Not because anyone has seen evidence to suggest the recounts are warranted, but because a candidate who never had a snowball’s chance in hell of winning is driving it — with the involvement of Hillary Clinton’s team as well.

Even close Clinton allies have to admit, the effort is a “big waste of time.”

Advertisement – story continues below


Related Stories

UNREAL: Obama admits he could've been really great, if ONLY...Clinton ally drops four-word TRUTH BOMB on recount effort...FIRED?! Trump announces he will LEAVE this as president...

As Breitbart reports:

Hillary Clinton’s aides and supporters are urging dispirited Democrats to channel their frustrations about the election results into political causes — just not into efforts to recount ballots in three battleground states.

The former Democratic presidential candidate and her close aides see the recount drive largely as a waste of resources, according to people close to Clinton. The effort is being fueled by Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who’s formed an organization to try to force recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

“Believe me if there was anything I could do to make Hillary Clinton the next president of the United States I would,” said former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, a longtime Clinton supporter. “But this is a big waste of time.

Aides say Clinton is focused on moving past her unexpected defeat and has devoted little attention to the recount or thinking about her political future. 

Former President Bill Clinton, meanwhile, has been poring over the election results, second-guessing decisions by top campaign aides and intensely trying to figure out how his wife lost the white working-class voters who were the base of his electoral coalition, say people familiar with the campaign.

Clinton’s team was aware of possible discrepancies soon after the election, telling top donors on a conference call four days after the election that they were looking into potential problems in the three states. But while many campaign staffers believe Russian hacking influenced the outcome of the election, blaming foreign actors for incursions into campaign and Democratic National Committee emails, they’ve found no evidence of the kind of widespread ballot box tampering that would change the results of the race — or even flip a single state.

Still, some dejected Clinton supporters have been unwilling to accept the results. Stein has raised $6.5 million for her recount campaign, according to a count posted on her campaign website on Tuesday. That’s nearly double the roughly $3.5 million she raised during her entire presidential bid.

Some former Clinton aides have asked frustrated supporters to donate their dollars to what they view as more constructive causes, like state parties or the Democratic candidate in Louisiana, where a Dec. 10 runoff will be the party’s last chance to pick up a Senate seat this year.

“I wouldn’t give a dollar to Jill Stein,” said Adam Parkhomenko, a longtime Clinton aide. “Volunteers, supporters and Democrats, they want to pick themselves up and get back out there. The best vehicle to do that is the Louisiana Senate race.”

Clinton’s team conducted an exhaustive investigation into the possibility of outside interference in the vote tally, tasking lawyers, data scientists and political analysts to comb over the results. They contacted outside experts, examined the laws governing recounts and double-checked all the vote tallies.

The campaign found no “evidence of manipulation,” wrote Marc Elias, the general counsel for Clinton’s campaign, in an online essay. But, he said, Clinton agreed to minimal participation in Stein’s effort, largely to make sure that her interests are represented. They put out a call for volunteers to monitor the proceedings and are relying on local lawyers to handle filings and other legal matters.

Clinton’s lawyers filed motions with a Wisconsin judge on Tuesday looking to join Stein’s lawsuit demanding that Wisconsin officials recount ballots by hand. The state elections commission will formally began the recount on Thursday.

To follow on Gov. Rendell’s suggestion that the recount efforts are simply a “big waste of time,” we have five words Team Clinton (and Jill Stein) would do well to heed:

It’s over. Move on already.

[This article was written by Michelle Jesse, Associate Editor]

 

H/T Allen B. West
by Michelle Jesse, Associate Editor ||Image Credit

(Visited 4 times, 4 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *